The Olympic Games are not just a celebration of athletic greatness; they are a powerful testament to the value of gender equity in sports. In a professional sports landscape that has historically undervalued and under-marketed women athletes, the Olympics have served as a (more) equitable playing field than women athletes typically encounter. The inclusion and prioritization of women athletes has not only enriched the Games in recent years, but it has also demonstrated that gender equity in sports is not just a moral imperative—it’s simply good business.
Now more than ever, the Olympic Committee is prioritizing gender equity in the Games. For the first time in Olympic history, the Paris Games achieved numerical gender parity on the field of play – meaning, the Games had the same number of female and male athletes competing. This is significant because it wasn’t until 2012 that women were even allowed to compete in every Olympic event, and it took until 2014 for the IOC to lay plans to work towards gender parity. What’s extra special about Paris 2024, is that women were not only equally included in competition during this Games, but women were quite literally the face of the Games. If you look at the official 2024 Olympic logo, you’ll see traditionally feminine characteristics that make up the iconic image of Marianne, who is a French woman chosen to be the first feminine face of the Olympic and Paralympic Games.
According to the IOC, “Marianne is a universal symbol embodied by iconic and influential women. She lends a human face to the Olympic Games, standing for the people and with the people. She symbolizes women’s emancipation and a strong signal that sport and its governing bodies are finally evolving.”
The design for the Paris 2024 Olympic Games in France is a unity of the gold medal, the flame, and the face of Marianne – a cherished symbol of the revolution and the people of France. Source: Olympics
Having a woman figure front & center in the brand identity of the Olympic Games is significant, but what’s especially important to note here is that a decision like this was most likely not taken lightly by the IOC. Knowing how big the business of the Olympic Games can be (during the last Olympiad, the IOC reported revenues of $7.6 billion USD), it would be surprising for the IOC to utilize branding that was not good for the organization’s bottom line.
By going all-in on Marianne, the IOC made a very intentional move to center women in their marketing strategy.
The IOC’s commitment to gender equity in the Paris Games is a significant milestone in the journey towards full gender equality in sports. It underscores the importance of inclusion, representation, and diversity in sports, and as the world watched the Paris Games, the message was clear: gender equity is here to stay, and it’s transforming the landscape of sports for the better.
Olympics Ratings 🤝 Women’s Sports
In the current landscape of women’s sports where business results hit new heights almost daily, it’s not surprising to see a major sporting organization recognize the value of fostering gender equality in sports. However, while big results driven by women’s sports might be new in some corners of the sports industry, it’s certainly not a new phenomenon for the Olympic Games. Olympic ratings have a history of demonstrating that it’s good business to market and create opportunities for women athletes.
During the 2020 Tokyo Games, CBC reported that four out of the five most viewed events were women’s events, and in the U.S. 59.1% of primetime TV coverage was dedicated to women athletes. Also worth noting is that during the Tokyo games, social media buzz around female athletes frequently eclipsed that of their male counterparts and dominated online conversations. According to Zoomph, Gymnast Sunisa Lee generated $6 million in social value from just nine Instagram posts, Simone Biles’ tweet thanking fans for supporting her decision to withdraw generated over 100 million organic impressions and $2.7 million in social value, and Katie Ledecky garnered 8.5 million organic impressions from her Instagram, with a staggering engagement rate of 12.83%.
Fast forward to 2024, and the success of the U.S. Olympic Trials foreshadowed that it will be another dominant year for women in the Olympics. NBC’s ratings for the 2024 Trials were up significantly, with women’s events leading the way.
An average of 7.6 million viewers tuned in across NBC and Peacock to watch Simone Biles qualify for her third Olympic gymnastics team, 4.5 million viewers (a 38% increase from 2021) tuned in to witness Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone set a new world record in the 400-meter hurdles, and roughly 3.2 million tuned in to watch Katie Ledecky in the U.S. Swimming Trials.
A Golden Standard 🏅
The Olympics serve as a powerful example of why gender equality in sports is good business. The inclusion and success of women athletes not only enhances the quality and appeal of the Games, but also drives significant economic benefits. From expanding viewership and engagement, to attracting sponsorships and promoting social change, gender equity in sports creates a virtuous cycle of growth and success. As we look to the future, it is clear that supporting and investing in women’s sports is not only the right thing to do – but is also a smart business decision. The Olympic Games prove that when it comes to sports, equality is not just a goal—it is a golden business strategy.
The Olympics: A Business Case for Gender Equity in Sports
By admin
Via Parity Now, a look at how Olympics ratings have long demonstrated that investing in women’s sports is a golden move:
CATEGORIES
- Accessibility
- Athletic Diplomacy
- Auto Racing
- Baseball
- Basketball
- Black Lives Matter
- Civil Rights
- Climate Change
- Cricket
- Figure Skating
- Football
- Gender, Equity, and Inclusion
- General Category
- Geopolitics
- Golf
- Gun Control and Advocacy
- Gymnastics
- Health Awareness and Equity
- Hockey
- Indigenous Peoples
- Lacrosse
- Mental Health Awareness
- Olympics
- Soccer
- Sportswashing
- Swimming
- Tennis
- Track and Field
ARCHIVE
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
Comments